Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

admin
Pinned February 8, 2023

<> Embed

@  Email

Report

Uploaded by user
$161
Google asks India’s Supreme Court to block $161.9 million Android antitrust ruling
<> Embed @  Email Report

Google asks India’s Supreme Court to block $161.9 million Android antitrust ruling

Google fined $161.9 million in India over ‘anti-competitive’ Android policies

 
Jon Fingas
Jon Fingas

Google is facing another fine for allegedly misusing its control of Android to suppress competition. CNET reports India’s Competition Commission has fined Google the equivalent of $161.9 million for supposedly giving its Android apps an edge using restrictive terms. The company imposes an “unfair condition” on phone makers by requiring that they preinstall Google apps as part of agreements, according to officials. That, in turn, is said to discourage companies from developing heavily modified Android variants that rely less on Google services.

The Commission also maintains that Google is wielding its “dominant position” to squeeze out competitors in search, app stores, web browsers and video services. Historically, Google has required that phones with the Play Store installed also include apps like Chrome and YouTube, often with prominent placement on the home screen. While you can always install alternatives like Firefox and Vimeo, they’re not included out of the box. Brands can use the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) if they want more flexibility, but they lose access to the Play Store in the process.

The regulator has issued a cease and desist order barring Google from requiring a “bouquet” of preinstalled apps. Companies have to be given the choice of which apps they want. Google also isn’t allowed to deny access to the Play Services framework, to include “anti-fragmentation” clauses that bar Android forks, or to offer incentives in return for exclusive search deals. Third-party app stores must be allowed to distribute through the Play Store. Users, meanwhile, must have the power to choose their search engine on setup and to uninstall Google apps they don’t want.

 
Google asks India’s Supreme Court to block $161.9 million Android antitrust ruling | DeviceDaily.com

Google has declined to comment until it receives the official Commission order. The investigation began in 2019, but didn’t determine that Google had abused its dominance until September 2021.

The fine is tiny for Google, which made about $257.6 billion in worldwide revenue last year. The order could force it to significantly alter its deals with Android manufacturers, however, and comes after South Korea, the European Union and others have demanded similar changes. And Google can’t afford to ignore India — it’s the second-largest smartphone market on Earth with about 606.6 million users. A forced withdrawal would significantly damage Google’s bottom line, not to mention clout in the mobile industry.

 

Engadget is a web magazine with obsessive daily coverage of everything new in gadgets and consumer electronics  

(19)