Apple claims Epic is trying to ‘micromanage’ its business operations in a new court filing
Apple claims Epic is trying to ‘micromanage’ its business operations in a new court filing
The company is asking a judge to deny Epic’s recent motion that accused Apple of violating a 2021 injunction.
![Apple claims Epic is trying to ‘micromanage’ its business operations in a new court filing | DeviceDaily.com Apple claims Epic is trying to ‘micromanage’ its business operations in a new court filing | DeviceDaily.com](https://www.devicedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Apple-claims-Epic-is-trying-to-micromanage-its-business-operations-in-a-new-court-filing.jpg)
Last month, Epic Games filed a motion asking a California judge to hold Apple in contempt for what it claims are violations of a 2021 injunction relating to the company’s App Store practices. Now, Apple is asking the judge to reject Epic’s request, alleging in a new filing spotted by Reuters that the motion is an attempt to “micromanage Apple’s business operations in a way that would increase Epic’s profitability.”
The original injunction by US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers required Apple to let developers provide an option for external payment methods, which would allow them to avoid fees of up to 30 percent on App Store and in-app purchases. Apple introduced new App Store guidelines for developers in January that do allow linking to external websites for purchasing alternatives, but the new rules also require they get Apple’s approval to do so and impose a commission of 12-27 percent for these transactions. Per Reuters, Epic argued that this makes alternative payment options “commercially unusable.”
Epic also said at the time that Apple’s “so-called compliance is a sham,” and accused the company of violating the injunction with its recent moves. Apple maintains that it has acted in compliance with the injunction, stating in the new filing, “The purpose of the Injunction is to make information regarding alternative purchase options more readily available, not to dictate the commercial terms on which Apple provides access to its platform, tools and technologies, and userbase.”
(11)