Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

admin
Pinned October 15, 2016

<> Embed

@  Email

Report

Uploaded by user
Democrats slam Republicans fighting the internet handover
<> Embed @  Email Report

Democrats slam Republicans fighting the internet handover

Jon Fingas , @jonfingas

September 21, 2016
 

Tim Hales/AP Photos

If you thought Facebook and Google raised a big fuss over Republican opposition to the US’ plan to hand the internet’s ‘keys’ (the authority managing domain name assignments) to an international governing body, you haven’t seen anything yet. A quintet of House and Senate Democrats have used TechCrunch to post an open letter to the Republicans, chastising them over their resistance to the transition to ICANN. While Senator Ted Cruz and supporters have previously claimed that international control would make it easier for authoritarian governments to censor the internet, the Democrats reject this outright. The task of managing the domain name system is “clerical,” they argue — countries like China or Russia can’t manipulate content just because DNS isn’t under exclusive US oversight.

If anything, the Dems argue, a delay past the planned October handover would play into Russia’s hands. It could push for moving these functions to an organization like the UN, where it’d have a better chance of skewing the internet in its favor — say, getting more authority to silence political opponents. And a delayed transition might tempt countries to create their own domain name system equivalents, fracturing the internet and giving them censorship powers that they can’t have today.

Not surprisingly, this is as much about us-versus-them politics as technical issues. The Democrats portray Cruz and crew as using the transition as an excuse to block a budget bill (before, many Republicans were fine with the handover), score points in election season and “mollify their extreme colleagues.” Whether or not you agree, it’s clear that at least some Democrats are determined to make this once-safe issue a major point of contention.

(17)