Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

admin
Pinned October 15, 2017

<> Embed

@  Email

Report

Uploaded by user
Microsoft canceled an ‘all-screen’ Windows phone in 2014
<> Embed @  Email Report

Microsoft canceled an ‘all-screen’ Windows phone in 2014

Jon Fingas, @jonfingas

October 09, 2017
 
Microsoft canceled an 'all-screen' Windows phone in 2014 | DeviceDaily.com
Windows Central

All-screen phones may be all the rage in 2017, but Microsoft apparently had chance to beat everyone to the punch 3 years ago… and whiffed it. Windows Central has obtained the prototype of an unnamed Windows phone (believed to be the precursor to the Lumia 435) that had extremely thin display bezels save for the bottom, where a chin held the front-facing camera. The performance would have been modest by 2014 standards with a 5-inch 720p screen, a Snapdragon 200 chip, 4GB of expandable storage and a 5-megapixel rear camera, but you’d have had an eye-catching design for under $200. To put it another way, you wouldn’t have had to buy a Sharp Aquos Crystal to impress your smartphone-toting friends while sticking to a budget.

It’s not certain why Microsoft axed this design. If it was meant to become the Lumia 435, Microsoft may have decided that the eye-catching screen was too expensive for the intended price point. If not, though, it’s trickier. Microsoft might have determined that it couldn’t mass-manufacture the phone, that it didn’t fit well into the overall product lineup, or that there wasn’t much of a market for low-cost Windows phones that didn’t quite sit at the lowest end of the spectrum.

Either way, it’s hard not to see the handset as a lost opportunity — Microsoft could have had a visually exciting yet affordable device, but passed on it in favor of far more pedestrian hardware. And in some ways, it helps explain why Microsoft’s late-stage mobile strategy kept flailing to the point where the company effectively quit development. Simply put, few exciting phones reached the market — whether it was due to technical issues or an excess of caution, Microsoft kept canceling bleeding-edge projects (like the fabled McLaren) that could have lured people away from Android and iOS. The all-screen phone wouldn’t have turned around Microsoft’s fortunes by itself, but it could have been part of a larger effort to reel you in with phone designs that had few if any equals.

 

(28)

Pinned onto