Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

admin
Pinned September 12, 2016

<> Embed

@  Email

Report

Uploaded by user
WikiLeaks revealed private info for ‘hundreds’ of innocents
<> Embed @  Email Report

WikiLeaks revealed private info for ‘hundreds’ of innocents

Jon Fingas , @jonfingas

August 23, 2016

AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth

WikiLeaks will tell you that it’s providing valuable transparency while respecting the privacy of innocent people, but the Associated Press isn’t convinced that it’s walking that fine line. It just published a report showing that Julian Assange and crew published sensitive details for “hundreds” of innocent people, including financial records, identity details and medical files. Among the examples, it identified teen rape victims. Many of last year’s leaked Saudi Arabia cables exposed details that could potentially ruin lives in the conservative country, such as the name of a man arrested for being gay and people who’ve secretly gone into debt.

WikiLeaks, not surprisingly, has gone on the defensive in light of the report. It asserts that the AP story is “ridiculous,” a “re-run” of a 2015 story that’s pointless when the Saudi government already has the details. The group is also floating a conspiracy theory, suggesting that US journalists are trying to discredit its activities now that it has published emails tarnishing the Democratic National Committee and “presumptive winner” Hillary Clinton.

It’s true that WikiLeaks didn’t leak the Saudi cables itself (it just made them easier to search), and AKP party data that contained sensitive Turkish voting info was uploaded by someone else (who has since deleted it). Many of the details aren’t new, for that matter. Even so, the report still isn’t flattering — it contradicts Assange’s promises of a “harm minimization policy” that protects medical records and other private details that aren’t necessary for exposing government corruption and overreach. However much good WikiLeaks might be doing, it’s not being very discriminate in what it allows on its site.

(22)